墨香园 -2015年考研英语经典专项阅读120篇
本书资料更新时间:2025-01-19 01:04:12

2015年考研英语经典专项阅读120篇 下载 mobi 免费 pdf 百度网盘 epub 2025 在线 电子书

2015年考研英语经典专项阅读120篇精美图片
》2015年考研英语经典专项阅读120篇电子书籍版权问题 请点击这里查看《

2015年考研英语经典专项阅读120篇书籍详细信息

  • ISBN:9787300187402
  • 作者:暂无作者
  • 出版社:暂无出版社
  • 出版时间:2014-02
  • 页数:320
  • 价格:38.70
  • 纸张:胶版纸
  • 装帧:平装
  • 开本:16开
  • 语言:未知
  • 丛书:暂无丛书
  • TAG:暂无
  • 豆瓣评分:暂无豆瓣评分
  • 豆瓣短评:点击查看
  • 豆瓣讨论:点击查看
  • 豆瓣目录:点击查看
  • 读书笔记:点击查看
  • 原文摘录:点击查看
  • 更新时间:2025-01-19 01:04:12

内容简介:

  此书文章均选自于《经济学人》和《新闻周刊》近几年来的文章,给出文章的译文、复杂句解析、设计出概要和细节题并给出解析、设计并点评段间语义逻辑关系从而为考研阅读新题型提供训练。此书针对考研学生苦于没有针对性阅读材料而设计,提高学生阅读感觉和速度,以逼真真题的阅读材料提高学生的阅读水平。


书籍目录:

Unit 1

Unit 1 试题详解

Unit 2

Unit 2 试题详解

Unit 3

Unit 3 试题详解

Unit 4

Unit 4 试题详解

Unit 5

Unit 5 试题详解

Unit 6

Unit 6 试题详解

Unit 7

Unit 7 试题详解

Unit 8

Unit 8 试题详解

Unit 9

Unit 9 试题详解

Unit 10

Unit 10 试题详解

Unit 11

Unit 11 试题详解

Unit 12

Unit 12 试题详解

Unit 13

Unit 13 试题详解

Unit 14

Unit 14 试题详解

Unit 15

Unit 15 试题详解

Unit 16

Unit 16 试题详解

Unit 17

Unit 17 试题详解

Unit 18

Unit 18 试题详解

Unit 19

Unit 19 试题详解

Unit 20

Unit 20 试题详解

Unit 21

Unit 21 试题详解

Unit 22

Unit 22 试题详解

Unit 23

Unit 23 试题详解

Unit 24

Unit 24 试题详解

Unit 25

Unit 25 试题详解

Unit 26

Unit 26 试题详解

Unit 27

Unit 27 试题详解

Unit 28

Unit 28 试题详解

Unit 29

Unit 29 试题详解

Unit 30

Unit 30 试题详解

 


作者介绍:

暂无相关内容,正在全力查找中


出版社信息:

暂无出版社相关信息,正在全力查找中!


书籍摘录:

  Unit

  1

  2015年考研英语经典专项阅读120篇

  Unit 1

  

  Text 1………………………………………………………………………………………………

  Entire cities and counties have banned themMcDonalds and Kentucky Fried Chicken have declared to give them up—as have Starbucks,Ruby Tuesday,and a host of other former sources of sinful pleasuresIn response to the 2006 Food and Drug Administration requirement that trans fats be listed on nutrition labels,makers of packaged goods have brought their totals down to zeroLast month,FritoLay even got the FDAs blessing to put a claim on products loaded with healthy,unsaturated fats that replacing bad fats with good ones may protect against heart disease

  Does this mean that junk food is now the new health food? “No! ” says Robert Eckel,immediate past president of the American Heart Association,whose “Face the Fats” education campaign points out that a “zerotrans fats” label doesnt tell the whole story“People know trans fats are not good for them,” says Eckel“But they do not understand that replacing them with saturated fat is not a good option” And that,in some cases,is whats happening. Yes,the food industry is experimenting with ways to keep the saturated fat content low—by using unsaturated options such as canola and sunflower oils,for exampleBut some manufacturers,unwilling to sacrifice taste and texture,are turning back to lessthanhealthful choices such as palm oil and butter

  Baked goods have proved particularly unwilling to changeThe solid fats that provide their light texture and flakiness as well as the rich flavor typically are either highly saturated or are “partially hydrogenated” oils that contain trans fatsMakers of fried foods have had an easier task,since certain liquid unsaturated oils can do as tasty a jobSnack makers,too,have found the switch to be relatively manageable

  Manufacturers are raising nutrition experts eyebrows with other tricks,tooWalter Willett,a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard whose research showed that trans fats promote heart disease,says that some companies now are fully,rather than partially,hydrogenating vegetable oilFull hydrogenation doesnt create trans fats as it solidifies the oil,but it does produce an acid,a saturated fat which seems in preliminary research to promote inflammation,thus contributing to heart disease“Im not in favor of using totally hydrogenated oil until more is known,” he says

  A recent study by the International Food Information Council Foundation shows that about 42 percent of Americans—a 9 percent increase over last year—are trying to cut back on certain healthy fats along with transfats“AlI people hear is that fat is bad,bad,bad,” says Susan Borra,president of the foundationIn fact,most people need more of the good kind

  1McDonalds and Kentucky Fred Chicken have pledged to get rid of

  Asinful pleasuresBtrans fatsCnutritious fatsDunsaturated fats

  2To which of the following statements would Robert Eckel most likely agree?

  A“Zero trans fats” label tells that the food is healthy for sure

  BJunk food is now thought of as the new health food

  CIt sometimes does no good to use saturated fats instead of trans ones

  DPeople dont realize that trans fats are harmful

  3According to Paragraph 3,food makers are reluctant to give up solid fats in baked goods in that

  Athey contribute to peoples healthBthey are partially hydrogenated

  Cthey are highly saturatedDthey provide pleasant texture and taste

  4When solidifying the oil,full hydrogenation might

  Adirectly lead to a certain diseaseBcreate trans fats

  Cgenerate unsaturated fatsDcontribute to fatal injury

  5The last paragraph suggests that

  Amost Americans try to reduce healthy fats and trans fats

  Bpeople should take in more healthy fats

  Cfat is really very bad without any benefits

  D51 percent of Americans tried less healthy fats last year

  

  Text 2………………………………………………………………………………………………

  Few disagreed with Christina Romer, who chairs Americas Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), when she wrote recently that the early 1960s were the CEAs “glory days”Take 1961, for instance. James Tobin was a member, Robert Solow was a staff economist, and consultant economists included Kenneth Arrow and Paul Samuelson. All four went on to win Nobel prizes.But fewer economists agreed with Ms Romers assertion that the CEAs staff in 2009 was of a calibre not seen since those starstudded days.

  Greg Mankiw, a Harvard economist who chaired the CEA in 2003—2005, points out that the council packed considerable intellectual firepower under Martin Feldstein in 1982Three of its members or staff—Larry Summers (now Barack Obamas chief economic adviser), Mr Feldstein himself and Paul Krugman—have won the Clark medal, a prize for the best American economist under the age of 40. Mr Krugman went on to win the Nobel prize. Mr Mankiw does not think the present lot match up to the class of 1982He suggests measuring the academic influence of CEAs by how often their economists have been cited by their peers.

  The Economist decided to see how different councils fared, through a widelyused index that ranks the top 5% of academic economists worldwide by citations to date. This is an imperfect measure, favouring members of older CEAs, who have both been active researchers for longer and whose influence was presumably boosted by their time on the council. Still, of the present CEAs three members, both Ms Romer and Austan Goolsbee make the cut. In comparison, all three members of Mr Mankiws CEA, and the one chaired by Janet Yellen during Bill Clintons later years in office, are on the list. More impressive is the fact that two of the seven senior economists attached to the present CEA are also among the top 5% of economists by citations, a rare distinction.

  Measured by citation scores per team member, though, the present CEA does not stand out as much. The average score for 2009 works out at 291, much higher than 2008s 185 (despite multiple citations for the then chairman, Edward Lazear) but well below the average for Mr Mankiws team of 2003, when the average was 641The count for 1982s “dream team” is an impressive 755For 1993, when Joseph Stiglitz and Alan Blinder were members of the CEA, and the senior economists included the eventually muchcited David Cutler and Matthew Shapiro, the average score is 7365Ms Romers team is handicapped by our use of lifetime citation counts, but the difference is still striking.

  Citations, of course, are an even more flawed measure of quality for staff economists, who tend to be younger. So we ranked the past ten years CEAs by the average quality of the economics departments where their senior economists got their PhDs. This too is imperfect, as the rankings do change, albeit slowly. But by this measure, the present cohort of senior staff economists is the secondbestqualified in academic terms of any of the past ten CEAs. It is beaten—but only barely—by the staff assembled by Glenn Hubbard for George Bush junior in 2001It does even better than Mr Feldsteins 1982 team. If part of any CEAs influence comes from the academic prestige of its members and staff, the present council has little to worry about. But it is not yet the most brilliant since the 1960s. Sorry, Ms Romer.

  1Who has not won the Clark medal before?

  ALarry Summers BGreg Mankiw

  CMartin Feldstein DPaul Krugman

  2The first paragraph suggests that

  AChristina Romer considers the CEAs staff in 2009 to be the most extraordinary since 1960s

  Beconomists often compare the CEAs staff in 2009 with that of the golden age

  Cthe glory day of the CEA has left for good

  DCEA in 2009 is full of preeminent economists

  3Which of the following statements is not an evidence for Ms Romers wrong assertion?

  AMeasured by citation scores per team mem



原文赏析:

暂无原文赏析,正在全力查找中!


其它内容:

暂无其它内容!


书籍真实打分

  • 故事情节:3分

  • 人物塑造:6分

  • 主题深度:9分

  • 文字风格:3分

  • 语言运用:6分

  • 文笔流畅:4分

  • 思想传递:4分

  • 知识深度:4分

  • 知识广度:6分

  • 实用性:6分

  • 章节划分:7分

  • 结构布局:3分

  • 新颖与独特:5分

  • 情感共鸣:6分

  • 引人入胜:5分

  • 现实相关:3分

  • 沉浸感:3分

  • 事实准确性:8分

  • 文化贡献:8分


网站评分

  • 书籍多样性:7分

  • 书籍信息完全性:7分

  • 网站更新速度:3分

  • 使用便利性:3分

  • 书籍清晰度:5分

  • 书籍格式兼容性:5分

  • 是否包含广告:7分

  • 加载速度:4分

  • 安全性:4分

  • 稳定性:9分

  • 搜索功能:3分

  • 下载便捷性:8分


下载点评

  • 还行吧(95+)
  • 值得购买(395+)
  • 购买多(359+)
  • 盗版少(504+)
  • 不亏(381+)
  • epub(156+)
  • 傻瓜式服务(222+)
  • 字体合适(297+)
  • 方便(105+)
  • 体验好(426+)

下载评价

  • 网友 蓬***之: ( 2024-12-23 04:36:25 )

    好棒good

  • 网友 扈***洁: ( 2025-01-08 00:05:43 )

    还不错啊,挺好

  • 网友 龚***湄: ( 2025-01-12 22:57:36 )

    差评,居然要收费!!!

  • 网友 冯***丽: ( 2025-01-18 04:35:19 )

    卡的不行啊

  • 网友 养***秋: ( 2024-12-31 04:02:05 )

    我是新来的考古学家

  • 网友 车***波: ( 2024-12-28 00:02:23 )

    很好,下载出来的内容没有乱码。

  • 网友 丁***菱: ( 2025-01-09 11:04:00 )

    好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好

  • 网友 孔***旋: ( 2025-01-16 05:52:14 )

    很好。顶一个希望越来越好,一直支持。

  • 网友 林***艳: ( 2024-12-23 17:34:58 )

    很好,能找到很多平常找不到的书。

  • 网友 宫***凡: ( 2025-01-02 03:39:00 )

    一般般,只能说收费的比免费的强不少。

  • 网友 曾***玉: ( 2024-12-23 20:08:37 )

    直接选择epub/azw3/mobi就可以了,然后导入微信读书,体验百分百!!!

  • 网友 堵***格: ( 2025-01-03 02:12:37 )

    OK,还可以

  • 网友 芮***枫: ( 2024-12-21 16:42:23 )

    有点意思的网站,赞一个真心好好好 哈哈

  • 网友 师***怀: ( 2025-01-08 08:44:29 )

    好是好,要是能免费下就好了

  • 网友 屠***好: ( 2024-12-29 14:17:22 )

    还行吧。

  • 网友 宓***莉: ( 2025-01-03 03:57:23 )

    不仅速度快,而且内容无盗版痕迹。


随机推荐